<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recent Legal decisions and how they effect Second Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/recent-legal-decisions-and-how-they-effect-second-life/317/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/recent-legal-decisions-and-how-they-effect-second-life/317/</link>
	<description>VTOR - Virtual TO Reality, featuring Second Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TD Goodliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/recent-legal-decisions-and-how-they-effect-second-life/317/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>TD Goodliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/recent-legal-decisions-and-how-they-effect-second-life/317/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>In over a year now that I&#039;ve been in SL I don&#039;t recall seeing any avatar that looked like a child. My comments on this so called ageplay activity -- real, imagined or otherwise -- haven&#039;t changed since April when I wrote this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I can’t imagine any desire being normal — even roleplaying or “ageplay” as it’s being characterized in SL — that makes imaginary sexual acts with virtual avatars that look like children acceptable. Sounds to me like another sick variation on kiddy porn (KP)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

via http://www.vtoreality.com/2006/ageplay-virtual-kp/122/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In over a year now that I&#8217;ve been in SL I don&#8217;t recall seeing any avatar that looked like a child. My comments on this so called ageplay activity &#8212; real, imagined or otherwise &#8212; haven&#8217;t changed since April when I wrote this:</p>
<blockquote><p>I can’t imagine any desire being normal — even roleplaying or “ageplay” as it’s being characterized in SL — that makes imaginary sexual acts with virtual avatars that look like children acceptable. Sounds to me like another sick variation on kiddy porn (KP)</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.vtoreality.com/2006/ageplay-virtual-kp/122/">http://www.vtoreality.com/2006/ageplay-virtual-kp/122/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

