<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reminder of Second Life Grid Closing Wensday Jan. 10th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/reminder-of-second-life-grid-closing-wensday-jan-10th/315/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/reminder-of-second-life-grid-closing-wensday-jan-10th/315/</link>
	<description>VTOR - Virtual TO Reality, featuring Second Life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TD Goodliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/reminder-of-second-life-grid-closing-wensday-jan-10th/315/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>TD Goodliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/reminder-of-second-life-grid-closing-wensday-jan-10th/315/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Harold - peer review, hope that's cool. This post is an example where &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; having additional supporting text actually hurts the clarity of this post.

This: &lt;blockquote&gt;I think the new update is required to fix the many problems caused by the last update. There doesn’t seem to be much in the new update that is new or original to this update.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Specific examples of the many problems caused by the last update that will be fixed by this update? Might want to add an update to this post (not a new post) with this specific information. From a reader perspective it is unclear to me specifically what you are referencing as to problems caused last time and fixed this time?

Not trying to stick up for Linden Lab here as I'm fairly certain what you wrote is factual, only somebody coming from the outside to read this that hasn't been following the viewer changelog (hint: link the changelog at least) is going to say ... huh, what, where? 

As readers, we got the when and how and why, just not the 'what' and 'where' parts. Hope you find this helpful and look forward to an update. Happy to help flesh this one out further if you want later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold - peer review, hope that&#8217;s cool. This post is an example where <i>not</i> having additional supporting text actually hurts the clarity of this post.</p>
<p>This:<br />
<blockquote>I think the new update is required to fix the many problems caused by the last update. There doesn’t seem to be much in the new update that is new or original to this update.</p></blockquote>
<p>Specific examples of the many problems caused by the last update that will be fixed by this update? Might want to add an update to this post (not a new post) with this specific information. From a reader perspective it is unclear to me specifically what you are referencing as to problems caused last time and fixed this time?</p>
<p>Not trying to stick up for Linden Lab here as I&#8217;m fairly certain what you wrote is factual, only somebody coming from the outside to read this that hasn&#8217;t been following the viewer changelog (hint: link the changelog at least) is going to say &#8230; huh, what, where? </p>
<p>As readers, we got the when and how and why, just not the &#8216;what&#8217; and &#8216;where&#8217; parts. Hope you find this helpful and look forward to an update. Happy to help flesh this one out further if you want later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
