<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Life would be a mistake for Xbox Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/</link>
	<description>VTOR - Virtual TO Reality, featuring Second Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:04:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Myke</title>
		<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/comment-page-1/#comment-10825</link>
		<dc:creator>Myke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/#comment-10825</guid>
		<description>i think having a Second Life for your Xbox would be quite ok, as long as Microsoft and or Sony would improve its performance and scaling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think having a Second Life for your Xbox would be quite ok, as long as Microsoft and or Sony would improve its performance and scaling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VTOR experiment: leave inline comments on any post &#187; VTOR - Virtual TO Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/comment-page-1/#comment-7389</link>
		<dc:creator>VTOR experiment: leave inline comments on any post &#187; VTOR - Virtual TO Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/#comment-7389</guid>
		<description>[...] Visit any of the 575+ posts at VTOReality like this one. 2. After the page loads, the LineBuzz javascript code will load and you can highlight any text [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Visit any of the 575+ posts at VTOReality like this one. 2. After the page loads, the LineBuzz javascript code will load and you can highlight any text [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius Sartre</title>
		<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/comment-page-1/#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius Sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 19:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>True. True.   SL would be crap. I actually don&#039;t mind the look of Sony&#039;s [HOME] if they can scale.  It just really depends on how they proceed with it if they did look into it.  I think that MS is too old fashioned to attempt it though.  It took them this long to figure out micropayments.  If Sony doesn&#039;t get it off the bat, I&#039;d feel bad for them considering the home company is in Asia... the region of the world that is home of micropayments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. True.   SL would be crap. I actually don&#8217;t mind the look of Sony&#8217;s [HOME] if they can scale.  It just really depends on how they proceed with it if they did look into it.  I think that MS is too old fashioned to attempt it though.  It took them this long to figure out micropayments.  If Sony doesn&#8217;t get it off the bat, I&#8217;d feel bad for them considering the home company is in Asia&#8230; the region of the world that is home of micropayments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD Goodliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/comment-page-1/#comment-7360</link>
		<dc:creator>TD Goodliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 19:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/#comment-7360</guid>
		<description>We didn&#039;t see the article differently. I hope they continue to consider the possibility of a virtual world. What I&#039;m saying is I don&#039;t want that virtual world to be Second Life. Here&#039;s an even better thought: a shared virtual world between Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft.

We can always dream :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn&#8217;t see the article differently. I hope they continue to consider the possibility of a virtual world. What I&#8217;m saying is I don&#8217;t want that virtual world to be Second Life. Here&#8217;s an even better thought: a shared virtual world between Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft.</p>
<p>We can always dream <img src='http://www.vtoreality.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius Sartre</title>
		<link>http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/comment-page-1/#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius Sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vtoreality.com/2007/second-life-would-be-a-mistake-for-xbox-live/944/#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>I took that article differently.  From what I understood, Shane Kim was saying that what Sony was doing was actually more difficult and that after spending time with Linden, MS wasn&#039;t going to consider the build because of the complexity.

They basically bashed Sony saying that it was a lot harder than it looked and that the HOME would fail.

I don&#039;t think SL had anything to do with it except for gauging the difficulty of code and scalability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took that article differently.  From what I understood, Shane Kim was saying that what Sony was doing was actually more difficult and that after spending time with Linden, MS wasn&#8217;t going to consider the build because of the complexity.</p>
<p>They basically bashed Sony saying that it was a lot harder than it looked and that the HOME would fail.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think SL had anything to do with it except for gauging the difficulty of code and scalability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
