Comments on: VR Legal Rights Revisited

By: Weirdharold

Weirdharold — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:27:43 +0000

I find it hard to believe that anyone could consider the turn around to be anything other than an attempt to back peddle from the negative reaction caused by said action. Over all the reaction of the SL public was negative I have even read calls for Dreamland to be boycotted …. not to mention that that charge of DMCA would have been practically impossible to claim. I usually think no press is bad press, but in this case…. People were genuinely PISSED

By: jvastine

jvastine — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:43:54 +0000

Crissa, this post wasn’t about having the ability to comment upon or even rate any video posted on YouTube. The system that YouTube incorporates does properly inform the user that if they wish to perform or use certain features, that the user needs to login or create an account. Just how long does it take to create a YouTube account and become a community member anyway? My experiencewas only about a minute and would hardly be considered an issue if I was trying to have a post removed that I thought was of an offensive nature to my wife. My point in this post was simply to show that there does exist multiple ways to contact YouTube besides using the DMCA violation form, despite Guntram Graef’s claims to the contrary. It is my belief that things sort of backfired upon the Graef’s and they are taking a step backward in an attempt to save face and turn the negative press around.

By: Crissa

Crissa — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:48:16 +0000

You can’t comment or rate a movie without being part of the YouTube community.